Studying that Google is decreasing the RAM necessities for Google TV despatched shivers down my backbone. I can already see the 1-star critiques flooding in for TVs that haven’t even launched but: “horrendous efficiency,” “laggy interface,” “don’t purchase.”

Google hasn’t specified the new minimal, however with Android TV dropping its requirement to simply 1GB, that’s probably the goal for upcoming budget Google TVs as properly. And that’s not good.

If there’s one factor good TVs completely don’t want, it’s worse specs — particularly much less RAM. Many budget TVs and streaming sticks already battle with efficiency, and RAM may be the distinction between a easy UI and a lag-fest. This isn’t a theoretical argument; I’ve lived it.

My first run-in with Google’s platform was 2020’s Chromecast with Google TV, seemingly a discount at simply $50. It shipped with simply 8GB of storage (only 4.4GB usable), 2GB of RAM, and a modest Amlogic S905X3 chip. The UI was simply easy sufficient, however heavier apps like Kodi felt sluggish, and attempting to breeze by way of a number of streaming companies was a battle. The expertise was OK, however hardly sensible, and the shortage of storage had me itching to ditch it.

My second try was a budget-conscious improve to a TCL 4K QLED. No OLED splurge right here — simply one thing low cost and supposedly ok for the odd consolation present. With a extra spacious 12GB of storage, 2GB RAM, and a quad-core Cortex-A55 CPU like my previous dongle, I figured it could at the very least match my Chromecast. Even higher, it got here with the previous stripped-back Android TV interface, which I hoped would run extra easily.

However then got here the dreaded replace. Seemingly in a single day, my TV was remodeled right into a sluggish mess, rebranded with Google TV’s bloated UI, full with uneven animations and intrusive advertisements — all the pieces I’d hoped to keep away from with the extra fundamental interface. Worse, as soon as easy UI scrolling turned to stutters, apps held on launch, and casting grew to become a glitchy, delayed mess.

The shift was surprising — easy(ish) sooner or later, verging on unusable the following. And there’s no rollback. Certain, I paid little, however I nonetheless really feel ripped off as I battle the now barely purposeful UI. Primarily based on my expertise, 2GB is the naked minimal for Google TV, however Google is decreasing the necessities. No, thanks.

So no, I’ve zero religion that “low RAM” TVs will profit anybody long-term. Particularly as Google is intent on stuffing the platform with extra advertisements and bloat that’ll only lavatory it down additional. Whereas placing good TV capabilities within the palms of extra shoppers sounds good on paper, a subpar expertise will have them reaching for different platforms when it’s time to improve.

RAM is simply a part of the image, in fact. UI lag and gradual loading instances are simply as a lot a fault of a budget CPUs that infest the budget TV sphere. However plentiful RAM ensures apps can stay in reminiscence between makes use of, making it sooner to hop again and forth with out horrendous load instances and UI stalls. Simply take a look at the beloved NVIDIA Defend TV: 2GB or 3GB of RAM (relying on the mannequin) and a handy guide a rough Tegra X1 nonetheless make it among the finest performers within the house — that’s the extent each Google TV ought to aspire to.

Not each TV must be a powerhouse, however there’s a minimal spec line that shouldn’t be crossed — and decreasing RAM necessities pushes us properly beneath it. Google’s transfer invitations producers to chop much more corners, and the result’s predictable: sluggish, irritating units that go away a bitter style for your complete platform.

If Google desires to compete in the lounge, it must implement larger minimal requirements, not decrease them. Till then, be cautious of good TVs with bargain-bin specs. Or higher but, overlook the built-in OS and put money into a stable Android TV field.